[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
any small software to test the incremental loading feature?
From: |
suzuki toshiya |
Subject: |
any small software to test the incremental loading feature? |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Apr 2023 21:40:02 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0 |
Hi,
Recently, Alex gave me an idea to improve FT_Get_CID_From_Glyph_Index() API for
CID-keyed font Type 0 (FontType 9, the most traditional CID-keyed font using
PostScript Type1 CharStrings) by adding a fallback to CID=0 for the cases that
the requested GID points to a broken entry providing no glyph data.
cid_load_glyph() can catch such an error but cannot stop the Type1 CharString
rendering after successful loading. Therefore, using cid_load_glyph() for
validating CID is too expensive; FT_Get_CID_From_Glyph_Index() is interested in
the presence of the glyph data but has little interest in its rasterization
result. For simple checking of the presence of the glyph data, I propose to
separate the glyph data loading part of cid_load_glyph() as 2 helper functions;
one is for incremental loading, another is a traditional disk-resident font
file. I drafted a few patches:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mpsuzuki/freetype-mps-wip/-/compare/master...wip-t1cid-separate-loaders-of-fd-offsets?from_project_id=11053&straight=false
But I need a good testing tool to check the possible regression for the
incremental loading. One of the most straightforward ideas would be using
GhostScript and some PostScript data generated by legacy printer drivers (which
can emit the per-glyph Type1 CharString and embed it to the output but cannot
make a self-standing CID-keyed font like that in PDF). But it is too big
software. I wish there were smaller - no need to render seriously - testing
tools. I tried to find something in the mailing list archive around 2002
Jun-Jul (when the main trunk merged the incremental loading feature, 22 years
ago!), but I could not find anything. Please let me know if anybody can
remember how the developers tested in those days.
Nothing to say; I've already tried GhostScript. But GhostScript uses
t1_load_glyph instead of cid_load_glyph.
The client of FreeType's incremental loading feature.
https://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=blob;f=base/fapi_ft.c;hb=HEAD
The emitter of the font stream for the FreeType.
https://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=blob;f=base/write_t1.c;hb=HEAD
There is an emitter of the incremental downloading font dictionary for
PostScript Type1 font, write_t1.c written by Graham Asher himself), but there
is no emitter for Type9 font (CIDFontType0 font).
Regards,
mpsuzuki
- any small software to test the incremental loading feature?,
suzuki toshiya <=