[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FreeType INSTCTRL behavior (Po Lu)
From: |
Alexei Podtelezhnikov |
Subject: |
Re: FreeType INSTCTRL behavior (Po Lu) |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Feb 2023 17:43:37 -0500 |
> /* UNDOCUMENTED! The MS rasterizer doesn't allow the following */
> /* graphics state variables to be modified by the CVT program. */
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 3:50 PM Hin-Tak Leung
<htl10@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> I think it is probably mis-documented - the projection vector and rp1 are not
> even per-glyph/contour parameter, but per contour fragment....
It does say that "Some [not all] state variables can be reset in the
CVT Program." (1)
Then it says that "instructions intended to move points within a
particular glyph outline cannot be used in the CV Program." (2)
I suppose you can figure out that projection vectors and references
are *intended to move points*. It could be clarified.
(1) https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/opentype/spec/tt_graphics_state
(2) https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/opentype/spec/prep
- Re: FreeType INSTCTRL behavior (Po Lu) (Re: Freetype-devel Digest, Vol 217, Issue 8), (continued)
- Re: FreeType INSTCTRL behavior (Po Lu) (Re: Freetype-devel Digest, Vol 217, Issue 8), Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2023/02/12
- Re: FreeType INSTCTRL behavior (Po Lu) (Re: Freetype-devel Digest, Vol 217, Issue 8), Po Lu, 2023/02/12
- Re: FreeType INSTCTRL behavior (Po Lu) (Re: Freetype-devel Digest, Vol 217, Issue 8), Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2023/02/12
- Re: FreeType INSTCTRL behavior (Po Lu) (Re: Freetype-devel Digest, Vol 217, Issue 8), Po Lu, 2023/02/13
- Deactivating the mailing list's digest feature, Werner LEMBERG, 2023/02/13
Re: FreeType INSTCTRL behavior (Po Lu), Werner LEMBERG, 2023/02/13