[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Check return of function
|
From: |
Alexei Podtelezhnikov |
|
Subject: |
Re: Check return of function |
|
Date: |
Thu, 20 Aug 2020 14:39:58 -0400 |
> In the first case, I think we need return because ttsize can be NULL and
> t42size->ttsize = ttsize; could get a NULL value.Is it a problem, no?
> In the first case, I think we need return because ttslot can be NULL and
> slot-> ttslot = ttslot; could get a NULL value.Is it a problem, no?
Why do you prefer to leave them uninitialized instead? and please stay on list.
- Check return of function, Kleber Tarcísio, 2020/08/20
- Re: Check return of function, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2020/08/20
- Message not available
- Re: Check return of function,
Alexei Podtelezhnikov <=
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Check return of function, Kleber Tarcísio, 2020/08/20
- Re: Check return of function, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2020/08/20
- Re: Check return of function, Kleber Tarcísio, 2020/08/20
- Re: Check return of function, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/08/21
- Re: Check return of function, Kleber Tarcísio, 2020/08/21