[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Build system considerations
From: |
Hugh McMaster |
Subject: |
Re: Build system considerations |
Date: |
Tue, 19 May 2020 22:09:19 +1000 |
On Mon, 18 May 2020 at 23:59, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > - Meson as the primary build system for FreeType developers, which
> > includes the ability to run tests, sanitizers, coverage analysis,
> > etc.
>
> It seems that Meson can create cmake package files, and probably build
> scripts, too. Wouldn't that be the best solution? I can also imagine
> that Meson builds `configure.ac`...
Is there any opportunity to avoid modifying ftoption.h directly to
enable, say, subpixel rendering with a new build system? Carrying
permanent patches for downstream packaging is annoying.
Personally, I'd like to be able to enable various options via
configure flags or a configurable file (JSON, anyone?) that's not a C
header. Python could do nicely here.
Other than that, the removal of RPATHs should be revisited. That's a
topic for another thread.
- Re: Build system considerations, Albert Astals Cid, 2020/05/01
- Re: Build system considerations, David Turner, 2020/05/17
- Re: Build system considerations, Nikolaus Waxweiler, 2020/05/17
- Re: Build system considerations, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/05/18
- Re: Build system considerations,
Hugh McMaster <=
- Re: Build system considerations, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2020/05/19
- Re: Build system considerations, Ben Wagner, 2020/05/19
- Re: Build system considerations, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2020/05/19
- Re: Build system considerations, David Turner, 2020/05/20
Re: Build system considerations, Timo Suoranta, 2020/05/17
Re: Build system considerations, Behdad Esfahbod, 2020/05/18