[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Build system considerations
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Build system considerations |
Date: |
Mon, 18 May 2020 15:58:45 +0200 (CEST) |
>> > In the end, and this is personal opinion, I find Meson cleaner than
>> > CMake,
I don't have to have a look at Meson to believe this immediately :-)
>> I'd vote for removing CMake support. Its inofficial status means that
>> people shouldn't rely on it anyway, even if there inevitably are
>> people that do.
>>
> I think providing a CMakeLists.txt that can be used directly to compile
> FreeType as a sub-project in a CMake-based project is still a very useful
> thing.
Yes.
> As well as a FindFreeType.cmake or FreeTypeConfig.cmake module to be
> installed to make the system library available.
Yes, too.
> - Meson as the primary build system for FreeType developers, which
> includes the ability to run tests, sanitizers, coverage analysis,
> etc.
It seems that Meson can create cmake package files, and probably build
scripts, too. Wouldn't that be the best solution? I can also imagine
that Meson builds `configure.ac`...
Werner
- Re: Build system considerations, Albert Astals Cid, 2020/05/01
- Re: Build system considerations, David Turner, 2020/05/17
- Re: Build system considerations, Nikolaus Waxweiler, 2020/05/17
- Re: Build system considerations,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: Build system considerations, Hugh McMaster, 2020/05/19
- Re: Build system considerations, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2020/05/19
- Re: Build system considerations, Ben Wagner, 2020/05/19
- Re: Build system considerations, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2020/05/19
- Re: Build system considerations, David Turner, 2020/05/20
Re: Build system considerations, Timo Suoranta, 2020/05/17
Re: Build system considerations, Behdad Esfahbod, 2020/05/18