[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GSOC - Distance Fields
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: GSOC - Distance Fields |
Date: |
Tue, 12 May 2020 22:15:10 +0200 (CEST) |
> I can't decide which format to use for storing the SDF(signed
> distance fields). I think using floating-point values (fixed-point
> in this case) for generation will be more accurate than using
> integer, but then saving the SDF to a file will require a
> conversion.
>
> So there can be few things,
>
> * Generate the SDF in floating-point values and then do a conversion
> while saving. (also a new pixel mode has to be added for this)
> * Generate the SDF in some other format which can be saved directly
> (e.g. unsigned byte). This will reduce the accuracy.
The basic question is whether the accuracy is really needed.
Currently, FreeType doesn't use floating-point arithmetics.
Personally, I would favour a solution without floats, but maybe there
are good reasons for using them.
Werner
- GSOC - Distance Fields, ANUJ VERMA, 2020/05/09
- Re: GSOC - Distance Fields, Anuj Verma, 2020/05/12
- Re: GSOC - Distance Fields,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: GSOC - Distance Fields, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2020/05/12
- Message not available
- Re: [Freetype-devel] Re: GSOC - Distance Fields, suzuki toshiya, 2020/05/12
- Re: [Freetype-devel] Re: GSOC - Distance Fields, Anuj Verma, 2020/05/12
- Message not available
- Re: [Freetype-devel] Re: GSOC - Distance Fields, suzuki toshiya, 2020/05/12
- Re: [Freetype-devel] Re: GSOC - Distance Fields, Anuj Verma, 2020/05/13
- Message not available
- Re: [Freetype-devel] Re: GSOC - Distance Fields, suzuki toshiya, 2020/05/13
- Re: [Freetype-devel] Re: GSOC - Distance Fields, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/05/13
- Message not available
- Re: [Freetype-devel] Re: GSOC - Distance Fields, suzuki toshiya, 2020/05/13
- Re: [Freetype-devel] Re: GSOC - Distance Fields, Anuj Verma, 2020/05/13
- Re: [Freetype-devel] Re: GSOC - Distance Fields, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/05/13