[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: freetype/coverity
From: |
Chris Liddell |
Subject: |
Re: freetype/coverity |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Feb 2020 12:28:36 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 |
Sorry folks... hit the send button by mistake
On 13/02/2020 12:20, Chris Liddell wrote:
> Hi Werner,
>
> On 04/02/2020 11:46, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>>
>> Hello Chris,
>>
>>
>>> We use Freetype with Ghostscript. We have also been using coverity
>>> static analysis for quite some time, [...]
>>>
>>> Would you (mainly Werner, but others too) consider there to be value
>>> in us doing the same for Freetype?
>>
>> yes, this would be valuable! Thanks for the offer. I'm certainly
>> interested in seeing the results.
>
> Cool, I'll look at at working it into our schedule.
>
> From experience, there will be a lot of changes that will be small edits
> (making casts explicit, adding prototypes, adding "/ fall through */"
> comments to switch statements).
>
> So, I would be inclined to setup a github repo, and point you guys at
> commits, which you can critique, pull, or redo as you see fit. But I'm
> willing to
(as this was supposed to say:)
.... willing to fit in whatever (reasonable) workflow you'd prefer.
Regards
Chris