Re: [ft-devel] GSoC: OT-SVG: Brief Update Week 6

[Werner LEMBERG]

>> I still favour the model of having a *single* default renderer for
>> SVG, providing hooks that can be overridden at run-time for another
>> library.
> 
> This is not user friendly and users will resist it.

If I'm going to use a non-default SVG engine then I clearly expect
some lines of code for doing this.  Why do you consider this not
user-friendly?

> 4) FT_Set_SvgHooks (at least use FT_Property_Set instead)

Using `FT_Property_Set' instead of `FT_Set_SvgHooks' is a good
suggestion, thanks!  Moazin, what do you think?  We would have one API
function less.

  https://www.freetype.org/freetype2/docs/reference/ft2-properties.html


    Werner