[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] Logging library proposal
From: |
Dmitry Timoshkov |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] Logging library proposal |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Jan 2019 22:52:28 +0800 |
<address@hidden> wrote:
> > Also, obviously there is no point in inventing new dependencies for such a
> > simple thing as logging.
>
> This is probably where I disagree the most. Logging/tracing in itself is
> far more than "a simply thing"; it is a tremendous debugging tool (when
> done right). Instructions that are (1) dead easy to insert and (2) generate
> output that is spot-on for whatever you're looking for in any specific
> situation can make the difference between firing up `gdb' or finding an
> issue within a few seconds. The current logger is great, but there are far
> better solutions out there.
It would be helpful to list the things that the developers would like
to see changed in the current logger, especially since it's already
great.
--
Dmitry.
- Re: [ft-devel] Logging library proposal, (continued)
- Re: [ft-devel] Logging library proposal, armin, 2019/01/22
- Re: [ft-devel] Logging library proposal, Dmitry Timoshkov, 2019/01/22
- Re: [ft-devel] Logging library proposal, Werner LEMBERG, 2019/01/22
- Re: [ft-devel] Logging library proposal, Dmitry Timoshkov, 2019/01/22
- Re: [ft-devel] Logging library proposal, Werner LEMBERG, 2019/01/23
- Re: [ft-devel] Logging library proposal, Dmitry Timoshkov, 2019/01/23
- Re: [ft-devel] Logging library proposal, Werner LEMBERG, 2019/01/23
- Re: [ft-devel] Logging library proposal, armin, 2019/01/23
- Re: [ft-devel] Logging library proposal, Dmitry Timoshkov, 2019/01/23
- Re: [ft-devel] Logging library proposal, armin, 2019/01/23
- Re: [ft-devel] Logging library proposal,
Dmitry Timoshkov <=
- Re: [ft-devel] Logging library proposal, Yash Khasbage, 2019/01/24
- Re: [ft-devel] Logging library proposal, prince.cherusker, 2019/01/22
- Re: [ft-devel] Logging library proposal, Werner LEMBERG, 2019/01/22