[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] Can freetype be more tolerant with this font?
From: |
Alexei Podtelezhnikov |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] Can freetype be more tolerant with this font? |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Jan 2019 17:42:09 -0500 |
> > > It appears that this got fixed between 2.9.1 and current head, which
> > > parses and renders "m" just fine. I have no idea what fixed it.
> >
> > master still has this problem for me.
> >
> > Can some body else please confirm if the font renders fine for them?
>
> I'm still seeing the same problem (freetype from git, as of a couple
> minutes ago; testing with my Xpdf code).
I am testing with ftview and ftstring: statically linked - no problem.
dynamically linked - yes problem.
How is this even possible?
- Re: [ft-devel] Can freetype be more tolerant with this font?, Albert Astals Cid, 2019/01/01
- Re: [ft-devel] Can freetype be more tolerant with this font?, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2019/01/01
- Re: [ft-devel] Can freetype be more tolerant with this font?, Werner LEMBERG, 2019/01/02
- Re: [ft-devel] Can freetype be more tolerant with this font?, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2019/01/02
- Re: [ft-devel] Can freetype be more tolerant with this font?, Derek B. Noonburg, 2019/01/02
- Re: [ft-devel] Can freetype be more tolerant with this font?, Werner LEMBERG, 2019/01/02
- Re: [ft-devel] Can freetype be more tolerant with this font?, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2019/01/02
- Re: [ft-devel] Can freetype be more tolerant with this font?, Albert Astals Cid, 2019/01/03
- Re: [ft-devel] Can freetype be more tolerant with this font?, Derek B. Noonburg, 2019/01/04
- Re: [ft-devel] Can freetype be more tolerant with this font?,
Alexei Podtelezhnikov <=
- Re: [ft-devel] Can freetype be more tolerant with this font?, Werner LEMBERG, 2019/01/04
- Re: [ft-devel] Can freetype be more tolerant with this font?, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2019/01/07
- Re: [ft-devel] Can freetype be more tolerant with this font?, Chris Liddell, 2019/01/08