[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ft-devel] patch for the missing ->end (Re: error enums that I _cannot_
From: |
Hin-Tak Leung |
Subject: |
[ft-devel] patch for the missing ->end (Re: error enums that I _cannot_ add) |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Jul 2016 20:39:03 +0000 (UTC) |
--------------------------------------------
On Thu, 21/7/16, Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> wrote:
>> BTW,
I think line 4010 is missing a "def->end =
exc->IP;"
> line.
"def->end" is not used except for bound
checking, (though
> precisely because it
is used for that, I did put it in my diagnostic
> patch set) so it is probably not
important, but you might still want
> to
add that line, to match how it looks around line 3715.
> Will add. Patch, please.
Here is the patch. But now that I look at it again, it seems strange that the
bound check
in JMPR is never triggered - do people never jump inside an IDEF? I suppose
IDEF itself
is rare enough.
0001-truetype-Record-the-end-of-IDEFs.patch
Description: Text Data
- [ft-devel] patch for the missing ->end (Re: error enums that I _cannot_ add),
Hin-Tak Leung <=