[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] GETVARIATION and GETDATA
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] GETVARIATION and GETDATA |
Date: |
Sun, 17 Jul 2016 23:35:24 +0200 (CEST) |
> Sorry, I think the 17 (or pushing one value onto the stack) is
> wrong.
Yes.
> I just added that push, and now I get piles and piles of
> instruction under flow errors, analysing those two fonts.
Yes, because the 0x92 IDEF is no longer seen.
> Assuming the font is mostly correct
I think it is even fully correct (at least w.r.t. bytecode 0x92).
> and intended to work correctly on apple platform...
I think it would fail miserably on an old Apple computer wit hinting
activated.
Werner
- Re: [ft-devel] GETVARIATION and GETDATA, (continued)
- Re: [ft-devel] GETVARIATION and GETDATA, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/07/17
- Re: [ft-devel] GETVARIATION and GETDATA, Hin-Tak Leung, 2016/07/17
- Re: [ft-devel] GETVARIATION and GETDATA, Hin-Tak Leung, 2016/07/17
- Re: [ft-devel] GETVARIATION and GETDATA, Hin-Tak Leung, 2016/07/17
- Re: [ft-devel] GETVARIATION and GETDATA, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2016/07/18
- Re: [ft-devel] GETVARIATION and GETDATA, Hin-Tak Leung, 2016/07/17
- Re: [ft-devel] GETVARIATION and GETDATA,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: [ft-devel] GETVARIATION and GETDATA, Hin-Tak Leung, 2016/07/17
- Re: [ft-devel] GETVARIATION and GETDATA, Hin-Tak Leung, 2016/07/20