freetype-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ft-devel] Support standardized CBDT/CBLC Re: Freetype-devel Digest,


From: Behdad Esfahbod
Subject: Re: [ft-devel] Support standardized CBDT/CBLC Re: Freetype-devel Digest, Vol 129, Issue 10
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2015 09:03:38 -0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0

On 15-11-07 09:02 AM, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> Hey,
> 
> Here:
> https://github.com/behdad/color-emoji/tree/master/examples

Those are source.  Pre-built fonts here:
https://github.com/behdad/color-emoji/tree/master/specification/examples

> Note that our sample fonts have version 2.0 as the table version number, where
> as the OpenType spec (which came after we shipped fonts) decided to use
> version 3.0.  I suggest accepting both, possibly just warn about 2.0.
> 
> b
> 
> On 15-11-06 09:13 PM, Hin-Tak Leung wrote:
>> Hi Behdad,
>>
>> do you have such a font and/or can point me in the direction of
>> one such file? I'll add support for that to the TODO list of you-know-what 
>> :-).
>> It doesn't currently parse those those tables, at all. I assume
>> that's because color glyphs is a recent (>2009) addition.
>>
>> Hin-Tak
>>
>>  Message: 2
>>  Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 14:13:54 -0400
>>  From: Behdad Esfahbod <address@hidden>
>>  To: "address@hidden"
>>  <address@hidden>
>>  Subject: [ft-devel] Support standardized CBDT/CBLC
>>  Message-ID: <address@hidden>
>>  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>>  
>>  Werner,
>>  
>>  Apparently somewhere during the standardization, CBDT/CBLC
>>  got their version
>>  bumped to 3:
>>  
>>    https://www.microsoft.com/typography/otspec/cblc.htm
>>    https://www.microsoft.com/typography/otspec/cbdt.htm
>>  
>>  FreeType currently only accepts 2, which is the number we
>>  used in our
>>  proposal.  ttsbit.c needs to be updated to accept
>>  3.  I suggest we accept both
>>  2 and 3 for both color and non-color versions of this. 
>>  Or you can only accept
>>  2 for non-color (EBDT/EBLC), and accept both 2 and 3 for
>>  color ones.  If doing
>>  so, you want to disable color in EBDT/EBLC as well..
>>  
>>  Whatever you do, please don't break our existing fonts, that
>>  is, CBLC/CBDT
>>  with version number 2.
>>  
>>  Thanks!
>>  -- 
>>  behdad
>>  http://behdad.org/
>>  
>>  
>>
> 

-- 
behdad
http://behdad.org/



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]