[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] Discrepancy in FT_MulFix macros and int sizes
|
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
|
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] Discrepancy in FT_MulFix macros and int sizes |
|
Date: |
Wed, 19 Nov 2014 06:32:34 +0100 (CET) |
> I was also wondering if FT_Long should be defined synonymous to
> FT_Int32, etc.
>
> typedef FT_Long FT_Int32
Hmm. FT_Int32 is *exactly* 32bit, while FT_Long is simply a typedef
to `long' and thus *at least* 32bit, depending on the compiler and/or
platform.
On 64bit platforms I think that compilers produce more efficient code
for the latter.
Werner