[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] WIP PATCH: clang static analyzer and warning fixes
|
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
|
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] WIP PATCH: clang static analyzer and warning fixes |
|
Date: |
Tue, 18 Mar 2014 07:37:25 +0100 (CET) |
> The patch 0004 is false positive. The variable 'hit' is set to zero
> when entering the loop so 'p_last' and 'p_first' are assigned almost
> immediately.
Thanks for the analysis. However, initializing doesn't hurt, and
pacifying one of the most used compilers is probably a good thing.
Werner
- Re: [ft-devel] WIP PATCH: clang static analyzer and warning fixes, Sean McBride, 2014/03/03
- Re: [ft-devel] WIP PATCH: clang static analyzer and warning fixes, Werner LEMBERG, 2014/03/03
- Re: [ft-devel] WIP PATCH: clang static analyzer and warning fixes, Sean McBride, 2014/03/05
- Re: [ft-devel] WIP PATCH: clang static analyzer and warning fixes, Werner LEMBERG, 2014/03/06
- Re: [ft-devel] WIP PATCH: clang static analyzer and warning fixes, Sean McBride, 2014/03/07
- Re: [ft-devel] WIP PATCH: clang static analyzer and warning fixes, Werner LEMBERG, 2014/03/09
- Re: [ft-devel] WIP PATCH: clang static analyzer and warning fixes, Sean McBride, 2014/03/14
- Re: [ft-devel] WIP PATCH: clang static analyzer and warning fixes, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2014/03/14
- Re: [ft-devel] WIP PATCH: clang static analyzer and warning fixes,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: [ft-devel] WIP PATCH: clang static analyzer and warning fixes, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2014/03/18
- Re: [ft-devel] WIP PATCH: clang static analyzer and warning fixes, Sean McBride, 2014/03/18
- Re: [ft-devel] WIP PATCH: clang static analyzer and warning fixes, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2014/03/18
- Re: [ft-devel] WIP PATCH: clang static analyzer and warning fixes, Werner LEMBERG, 2014/03/19
- Re: [ft-devel] WIP PATCH: clang static analyzer and warning fixes, Werner LEMBERG, 2014/03/18