Re: [ft-devel] Registration of a set of trickyfonts by NEC

[suzuki toshiya]

Just I've uploaded an archive:
http://gyvern.ipc.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/~mpsuzuki/ooo-ttf-checksum-test.zip

it includes following files:
* LiberationSerif-Regular.ttf - a free font including cvt/fpgm/prep tables
* LiberationSerif.odt - an ODT document referring LiberationSerif font
* LiberationSerif-OO3.pdf - a PDF generated by LibreOffice 3.3.1
  to be precisely, OOO330m19 (Build:8) tagged libreoffice-3.3.1.2, Debian 
package (1:3.3.1-1)
* embedded-font.pdf - subsetted & embedded font in the PDF

I think this is not Debian specific issue, but reporting the issue by
Debian binary to LibreOffice official maintainers won't be welcomed.
I will make more official style report for their official bugzilla.
But I have to work with other issues before it...

Regards,
mpsuzuki

address@hidden wrote:
> Yes, I should file the bug with yet another sample
> with free fonts (NEC FA-xxx fonts are proprietary)
> including the clarification you commented.
> 
> Regards,
> mpsuzuki
> 
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 18:23:32 +0900
> Miles Bader <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> suzuki toshiya <address@hidden> writes:
>>> BTW, during the production of sample PDF, I found that
>>> OpenOffice.org generates wrong checksum for embedded TTF,
>>> so the tricky font detection by the checksum cannot solve
>>> the problem :-(
>> Could you compare against _both_ the real checksum and the bogus
>> OpenOffice.org checksum, and recognize both?  [Maybe just add separate
>> entries for the "bogus OpenOffice.org version" of these fonts...]
>>
>> -Miles
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Freetype-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel