[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] [PATCH] Improve FT_MulFix
From: |
James Cloos |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] [PATCH] Improve FT_MulFix |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Apr 2011 18:32:12 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110016 (No Gnus v0.16) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> "WL" == Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> writes:
WL> Oh, so it's really me who is dumb :-)
:-)
WL> If James confirms your statement, I'm going to replace the code as
WL> he has suggested in his patch..
It is identical in effect, and the idea comes from the assembly versions
FT_MulFix_arm and FT_MulFix_i386 which are already there (builds/unix/
ftconfig.in and again in include/freetype/config/ftconfig.h).
But I ran into a problem.
The FT_LONG64 blocks of ftcalc.c are ignored for all (modern) gcc builds
becasue of this code in (both versions of) ftconfig:
#ifdef __STDC__
/* undefine the 64-bit macros in strict ANSI compilation mode */
#undef FT_LONG64
#undef FT_INT64
#endif /* __STDC__ */
That might have been reasonable in the past, but __STDC__ is defined by
default now (even w/o the -ansi -pedantic which freetype forces on),
int64_t and uint64_t are part of std c, and FT_LONG64 should be uncond-
itionally set when on a LP64 arch.
And gcc's output even on ILP32 arches is generally better than
freetype's !FT_LONG64 code, since most such archs have a 32x32=64 bit
integer multiply instruction and gcc is smart enough to notice that
the multiplicands are 32 bits.
-JimC
--
James Cloos <address@hidden> OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6
- [ft-devel] [PATCH] Improve FT_MulFix, James Cloos, 2011/04/04
- Re: [ft-devel] [PATCH] Improve FT_MulFix, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/04/05
- Re: [ft-devel] [PATCH] Improve FT_MulFix, James Cloos, 2011/04/05
- Re: [ft-devel] [PATCH] Improve FT_MulFix, Behdad Esfahbod, 2011/04/05
- Re: [ft-devel] [PATCH] Improve FT_MulFix, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/04/05
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [ft-devel] [PATCH] Improve FT_MulFix, Алексей Подтележников, 2011/04/07
- Re: [ft-devel] [PATCH] Improve FT_MulFix, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/04/07
- Re: [ft-devel] [PATCH] Improve FT_MulFix,
James Cloos <=
- Re: [ft-devel] [PATCH] Improve FT_MulFix, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/04/08
- Re: [ft-devel] [PATCH] Improve FT_MulFix, James Cloos, 2011/04/08
- Re: [ft-devel] [PATCH] Improve FT_MulFix, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/04/18
- Re: [ft-devel] [PATCH] Improve FT_MulFix, James Cloos, 2011/04/18