Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

freetype-devel (thread)

[Date Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Fri Jul 31 2009 12:47:47 -0400 Threads in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• [ft-devel] backward/forward binary compatibility checker, Andrey Ponomarenko, 2009/07/28
• [ft-devel] CFF in OpenType is SID to CID mapping correct?, Boris Letocha, 2009/07/26
  • Re: [ft-devel] CFF in OpenType is SID to CID mapping correct?, mpsuzuki, 2009/07/26
  • Re: [ft-devel] CFF in OpenType is SID to CID mapping correct?, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/07/27
    • RE: [ft-devel] CFF in OpenType is SID to CID mapping correct?, Boris Letocha, 2009/07/27
      • Re: [ft-devel] CFF in OpenType is SID to CID mapping correct?, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/07/28
      • RE: [ft-devel] CFF in OpenType is SID to CID mapping correct?, Boris Letocha, 2009/07/29
      • Re: [ft-devel] CFF in OpenType is SID to CID mapping correct?, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/07/30
    • Re: [ft-devel] CFF in OpenType is SID to CID mapping correct?, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/07/29
• [ft-devel] Aliasing bug in FreeType, Behdad Esfahbod, 2009/07/25
  • Re: [ft-devel] Aliasing bug in FreeType, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/07/29
• [ft-devel] [bug #27045] "mingw32-make.exe setup" does not work well in CMD of WINE, mpsuzuki, 2009/07/17
  • [ft-devel] Re: [bug #27045] "mingw32-make.exe setup" does not work well in CMD of WINE, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/07/17
    • [ft-devel] Re: [bug #27045] "mingw32-make.exe setup" does not work well in CMD of WINE, mpsuzuki, 2009/07/17
• Re: [ft-devel] Improvement of ft_ansi_stream_io, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/07/15
• [ft-devel] How to draw a line, Donming Ho, 2009/07/14
  • Re: [ft-devel] How to draw a line, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/07/15
    • Re: [ft-devel] How to draw a line, Pierre Joye, 2009/07/19
• [ft-devel] Anybody could check current FT2 for WATCOM compiler?, mpsuzuki, 2009/07/14
  • Re: [ft-devel] Anybody could check current FT2 for WATCOM compiler?, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/07/14
    • Re: [ft-devel] Anybody could check current FT2 for WATCOM compiler?, mpsuzuki, 2009/07/14
• [ft-devel] BUG: 2005 VC++ Project Error, Merlin Avery, 2009/07/09
  • Re: [ft-devel] BUG: 2005 VC++ Project Error, mpsuzuki, 2009/07/10
  • Re: [ft-devel] BUG: 2005 VC++ Project Error, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/07/14
• [ft-devel] trace_gloader is registered in fttrace.h, mpsuzuki, 2009/07/09
  • [ft-devel] Re: trace_gloader is registered in fttrace.h, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/07/09
    • [ft-devel] Re: trace_gloader is registered in fttrace.h, mpsuzuki, 2009/07/09
      • [ft-devel] Re: trace_gloader is registered in fttrace.h, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/07/09
      • [ft-devel] Re: trace_gloader is registered in fttrace.h, mpsuzuki, 2009/07/10
      • [ft-devel] Re: trace_gloader is registered in fttrace.h, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/07/11
      • [ft-devel] Re: trace_gloader is registered in fttrace.h, mpsuzuki, 2009/07/12
      • [ft-devel] Re: trace_gloader is registered in fttrace.h, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/07/15
• Re: [ft-devel] Outline n_points are int16 so overflow is possible because missing check, mpsuzuki, 2009/07/07
  • Re: [ft-devel] Outline n_points are int16 so overflow is possible because missing check, John Tytgat, 2009/07/07
    • Re: [ft-devel] Outline n_points are int16 so overflow is possible because missing check, mpsuzuki, 2009/07/07
    • Re: [ft-devel] Outline n_points are int16 so overflow is possible because missing check, Sean McBride, 2009/07/07
  • RE: [ft-devel] Outline n_points are int16 so overflow is possible because missing check, Boris Letocha, 2009/07/07
    • Re: [ft-devel] Outline n_points are int16 so overflow is possible because missing check, mpsuzuki, 2009/07/07
    • [ft-devel] How FT_Load_Glyph() should work for the glyph description that cannot be rendered correctly?, mpsuzuki, 2009/07/08
      • [ft-devel] Re: How FT_Load_Glyph() should work for the glyph description that cannot be rendered correctly?, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/07/08
      • [ft-devel] Re: How FT_Load_Glyph() should work for the glyph description that cannot be rendered correctly?, mpsuzuki, 2009/07/08
      • [ft-devel] Re: How FT_Load_Glyph() should work for the glyph description that cannot be rendered correctly?, mpsuzuki, 2009/07/09
      • [ft-devel] Re: How FT_Load_Glyph() should work for the glyph description that cannot be rendered correctly?, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/07/15
• [ft-devel] 16bit patch set is updated to git HEAD, mpsuzuki, 2009/07/03
  • [ft-devel] Re: 16bit patch set is updated to git HEAD, mpsuzuki, 2009/07/03
  • [ft-devel] Re: 16bit patch set is updated to git HEAD, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/07/15
    • [ft-devel] Re: 16bit patch set is updated to git HEAD, mpsuzuki, 2009/07/31
      • [ft-devel] Re: 16bit patch set is updated to git HEAD, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/07/31

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc