Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

freetype-devel (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Fri Jul 31 2009 12:47:47 -0400 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• July 31, 2009
  • [ft-devel] Re: 16bit patch set is updated to git HEAD, Werner LEMBERG, 12:47
  • [ft-devel] Re: 16bit patch set is updated to git HEAD, mpsuzuki, 11:51
• July 30, 2009
  • Re: [ft-devel] CFF in OpenType is SID to CID mapping correct?, Werner LEMBERG, 13:25
• July 29, 2009
  • Re: [ft-devel] CFF in OpenType is SID to CID mapping correct?, Werner LEMBERG, 11:07
  • RE: [ft-devel] CFF in OpenType is SID to CID mapping correct?, Boris Letocha, 10:44
  • Re: [ft-devel] Aliasing bug in FreeType, Werner LEMBERG, 06:01
• July 28, 2009
  • Re: [ft-devel] CFF in OpenType is SID to CID mapping correct?, Werner LEMBERG, 16:43
  • [ft-devel] backward/forward binary compatibility checker, Andrey Ponomarenko, 09:06
• July 27, 2009
  • RE: [ft-devel] CFF in OpenType is SID to CID mapping correct?, Boris Letocha, 05:10
  • Re: [ft-devel] CFF in OpenType is SID to CID mapping correct?, Werner LEMBERG, 01:34
• July 26, 2009
  • Re: [ft-devel] CFF in OpenType is SID to CID mapping correct?, mpsuzuki, 22:34
  • [ft-devel] CFF in OpenType is SID to CID mapping correct?, Boris Letocha, 20:47
• July 25, 2009
  • [ft-devel] Aliasing bug in FreeType, Behdad Esfahbod, 16:03
• July 19, 2009
  • Re: [ft-devel] How to draw a line, Pierre Joye, 10:10
• July 17, 2009
  • [ft-devel] Re: [bug #27045] "mingw32-make.exe setup" does not work well in CMD of WINE, mpsuzuki, 08:40
  • [ft-devel] Re: [bug #27045] "mingw32-make.exe setup" does not work well in CMD of WINE, Werner LEMBERG, 07:56
  • [ft-devel] [bug #27045] "mingw32-make.exe setup" does not work well in CMD of WINE, mpsuzuki, 03:02
• July 15, 2009
  • Re: [ft-devel] Improvement of ft_ansi_stream_io, Werner LEMBERG, 06:18
  • [ft-devel] Re: 16bit patch set is updated to git HEAD, Werner LEMBERG, 06:18
  • [ft-devel] Re: How FT_Load_Glyph() should work for the glyph description that cannot be rendered correctly?, Werner LEMBERG, 06:18
  • [ft-devel] Re: trace_gloader is registered in fttrace.h, Werner LEMBERG, 06:18
  • Re: [ft-devel] How to draw a line, Werner LEMBERG, 06:17
• July 14, 2009
  • [ft-devel] How to draw a line, Donming Ho, 16:43
  • Re: [ft-devel] Anybody could check current FT2 for WATCOM compiler?, mpsuzuki, 13:45
  • Re: [ft-devel] BUG: 2005 VC++ Project Error, Werner LEMBERG, 10:47
  • Re: [ft-devel] Anybody could check current FT2 for WATCOM compiler?, Werner LEMBERG, 09:21
  • [ft-devel] Anybody could check current FT2 for WATCOM compiler?, mpsuzuki, 08:09
• July 12, 2009
  • [ft-devel] Re: trace_gloader is registered in fttrace.h, mpsuzuki, 11:28
• July 11, 2009
  • [ft-devel] Re: trace_gloader is registered in fttrace.h, Werner LEMBERG, 02:38
• July 10, 2009
  • [ft-devel] Re: trace_gloader is registered in fttrace.h, mpsuzuki, 02:54
  • Re: [ft-devel] BUG: 2005 VC++ Project Error, mpsuzuki, 00:13
• July 09, 2009
  • [ft-devel] BUG: 2005 VC++ Project Error, Merlin Avery, 23:54
  • [ft-devel] Re: How FT_Load_Glyph() should work for the glyph description that cannot be rendered correctly?, mpsuzuki, 05:34
  • [ft-devel] Re: trace_gloader is registered in fttrace.h, Werner LEMBERG, 02:10
  • [ft-devel] Re: trace_gloader is registered in fttrace.h, mpsuzuki, 01:20
  • [ft-devel] Re: trace_gloader is registered in fttrace.h, Werner LEMBERG, 00:19
  • [ft-devel] trace_gloader is registered in fttrace.h, mpsuzuki, 00:02
• July 08, 2009
  • [ft-devel] Re: How FT_Load_Glyph() should work for the glyph description that cannot be rendered correctly?, mpsuzuki, 08:01
  • [ft-devel] Re: How FT_Load_Glyph() should work for the glyph description that cannot be rendered correctly?, Werner LEMBERG, 06:41
  • [ft-devel] How FT_Load_Glyph() should work for the glyph description that cannot be rendered correctly?, mpsuzuki, 04:54
• July 07, 2009
  • RE: [ft-devel] Outline n_points are int16 so overflow is possible because missing check, Boris Letocha, 14:00
  • Re: [ft-devel] Outline n_points are int16 so overflow is possible because missing check, mpsuzuki, 12:08
  • Re: [ft-devel] Outline n_points are int16 so overflow is possible because missing check, Sean McBride, 11:52
  • Re: [ft-devel] Outline n_points are int16 so overflow is possible because missing check, mpsuzuki, 11:15
  • Re: [ft-devel] Outline n_points are int16 so overflow is possible because missing check, John Tytgat, 09:15
  • Re: [ft-devel] Outline n_points are int16 so overflow is possible because missing check, mpsuzuki, 08:42
• July 03, 2009
  • [ft-devel] Re: 16bit patch set is updated to git HEAD, mpsuzuki, 08:22
  • [ft-devel] 16bit patch set is updated to git HEAD, mpsuzuki, 08:22

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc