[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] otvalid modules
From: |
George Williams |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] otvalid modules |
Date: |
12 Aug 2007 12:54:21 -0700 |
On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 01:22, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> Applied. However, I think there is a mistake for the
> SingleSubstFormat1 case:
>
> idx = otv_Coverage_get_first( Coverage ) + DeltaGlyphID;
> if ( idx < 0 ||
> idx + DeltaGlyphID < 0 ||
> (FT_UInt)idx + DeltaGlyphID >= valid->glyph_count )
> FT_INVALID_GLYPH_ID;
>
> The code adds DeltaGlyphID to idx, and then you are checking whether
> `idx + DeltaGlyphID < 0'... This looks wrong to me. I don't have
> time currently to verify this. Please post a patch if necessary.
DeltaGlyphID can be a negative value, so I think it's a reasonable
check.
- [ft-devel] otvalid modules, George Williams, 2007/08/07
- Re: [ft-devel] otvalid modules, Behdad Esfahbod, 2007/08/08
- Re: [ft-devel] otvalid modules, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/08/08
- Re: [ft-devel] otvalid modules, George Williams, 2007/08/08
- Re: [ft-devel] otvalid modules, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/08/08
- Re: [ft-devel] otvalid modules, George Williams, 2007/08/10
- Re: [ft-devel] otvalid modules, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/08/11
- Re: [ft-devel] otvalid modules,
George Williams <=
- Re: [ft-devel] otvalid modules, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/08/17
- Re: [ft-devel] otvalid modules, George Williams, 2007/08/17
- Re: [ft-devel] otvalid modules, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/08/17