[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] otvalid modules
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] otvalid modules |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Aug 2007 20:24:25 +0200 (CEST) |
> > I suggest a new API, probably one which can be extended in the
> > (unlikely?) case the OpenType people define a new table. Can you
> > provide something?
>
> I thought of a couple of things:
> A function that validated a single table (when given a face &
> tag) returns: Table not understood
> Table not in font
> Table invalid
> Table valid
> or a function like the current one except it doesn't return any
> tables... just goes off and validates whatever it can.
>
> > Everything looks very good. I just wonder why some
> > `OTV_NAME_ENTER' constructs are commented out. Do you want to
> > avoid a flood of tracing messages?
> I wasn't sure... but yes, basically I was afraid of too much output.
> There's potentially one of those for every glyph in the font. Feel
> free to remove the comments if you think that best.
Suzuki-san, what do you think and/or suggest?
Werner
- [ft-devel] otvalid modules, George Williams, 2007/08/07
- Re: [ft-devel] otvalid modules, Behdad Esfahbod, 2007/08/08
- Re: [ft-devel] otvalid modules, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/08/08
- Re: [ft-devel] otvalid modules, George Williams, 2007/08/08
- Re: [ft-devel] otvalid modules,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: [ft-devel] otvalid modules, George Williams, 2007/08/10
- Re: [ft-devel] otvalid modules, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/08/11
- Re: [ft-devel] otvalid modules, George Williams, 2007/08/12
- Re: [ft-devel] otvalid modules, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/08/17
- Re: [ft-devel] otvalid modules, George Williams, 2007/08/17
- Re: [ft-devel] otvalid modules, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/08/17