[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] we don't need both FT_CONFIG_OPTION_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES and
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] we don't need both FT_CONFIG_OPTION_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES and FT_CONFIG_OPTION_NO_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Aug 2007 13:02:19 +0200 (CEST) |
> > > And - one other thing - we need to enclose the whole of
> > > pstables.h in
> > >
> > > #ifdef FT_CONFIG_OPTION_ADOBE_GLYPH_LIST ... #endif
> >
> > This is not correct. For example, ft_standard_glyph_names is used
> > in ps_get_macintosh_name which is not within the scope of the
> > abovementioned macro.
>
> Okay - but I suggest that we need (or is there already?) a macro to
> prevent compilation of these large tables, which are about 60K in
> size, when they are not needed.
Please prepare a patch -- there are other #ifdefs there which could be
used to limit the scope.
Werner
PS: BTW, what about installing GNU diff on your platform? This would
*greatly* simplify your reports.