[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [ft-devel] we don't need both FT_CONFIG_OPTION_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES and
|
From: |
Graham Asher |
|
Subject: |
RE: [ft-devel] we don't need both FT_CONFIG_OPTION_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES and FT_CONFIG_OPTION_NO_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES |
|
Date: |
Fri, 3 Aug 2007 09:42:17 +0100 |
Okay - but I suggest that we need (or is there already?) a macro to prevent
compilation of these large tables, which are about 60K in size, when they
are not needed.
Graham
-----Original Message-----
From: Werner LEMBERG [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: 02 August 2007 23:19
To: address@hidden
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [ft-devel] we don't need both FT_CONFIG_OPTION_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES
and FT_CONFIG_OPTION_NO_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES
> And - one other thing - we need to enclose the whole of pstables.h
> in
>
> #ifdef FT_CONFIG_OPTION_ADOBE_GLYPH_LIST ... #endif
This is not correct. For example, ft_standard_glyph_names is used in
ps_get_macintosh_name which is not within the scope of the
abovementioned macro.
Werner