[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] Minor misc patches to freetype cvs, from custom c
From: |
David Turner |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] Minor misc patches to freetype cvs, from custom changes in vtk |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Mar 2007 11:37:48 +0100 |
> The relevant part is where it says how to handle incorrect expression
> syntax in an #if statement. Because where FOO is undefined, #if FOO
> expands to a null expression which is not a valid one...
>
I have not found anything in the document that discusses this case; maybe I
missed it, but it's strange that the MSDN documentation doesn't mention it
on the other hand, I just tried to compiled the following program on Windows:
#if FOO_IS_UNDEFINED
#error "should not happen"
#else
int dummy;
#endif
I had correct compilation, without warnings with all the following compilers
though:
MingW (GCC)
Visual C++ 6
Visual C++ 7
Borland C++ 5.5
OpenWatcom C++ (don't remember version)
Win32-LCC (don't remember version)
I only used the default compiler options though (no -ansi or equivalent); I
would
say it's pretty widely supported. Apparently the Microsoft compilers and their
documentation don't agree on everything; I'm not too surprised, I've seen the
same
thing with GCC :-)
Regards,
- David
> > So "#if FOO, where FOO is undefined" is ok with GNU cpp [2] but not
> > with Visual C++ [3]
> > I haven't looked at other compilers, but I wouldn't be surprised to
> > see that this is
> > a GNU-specific extension, or it may come from a tradition of various
> > Unix pre-processors,
> > but certainly can't be generalized...
>
> Well, a trick I have used in one of my projects is to write "#if FOO+0"
> but most people don't like it.
>
> --
> behdad
> http://behdad.org/
>
> "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little
> Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
> -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759
>
>
>
- [ft-devel] Minor misc patches to freetype cvs, from custom changes in vtk, Sean McBride, 2007/03/19
- Re: [ft-devel] Minor misc patches to freetype cvs, from custom changes in vtk, mpsuzuki, 2007/03/19
- Re: [ft-devel] Minor misc patches to freetype cvs, from custom changes in vtk, David Turner, 2007/03/20
- Re: [ft-devel] Minor misc patches to freetype cvs, from custom changes in vtk, Miles Bader, 2007/03/21
- Re: [ft-devel] Minor misc patches to freetype cvs, from custom changes in vtk, David Turner, 2007/03/22
- Re: [ft-devel] Minor misc patches to freetype cvs, from custom changes in vtk, Behdad Esfahbod, 2007/03/22
- Re: [ft-devel] Minor misc patches to freetype cvs, from custom changes in vtk,
David Turner <=
- Re: [ft-devel] Minor misc patches to freetype cvs, from custom changes in vtk, Miles Bader, 2007/03/23
- Re: [ft-devel] Minor misc patches to freetype cvs, from custom changes in vtk, gww, 2007/03/22
Re: [ft-devel] Minor misc patches to freetype cvs, from custom changes in vtk, Sean McBride, 2007/03/20
- Re: [ft-devel] Minor misc patches to freetype cvs, from custom changes in vtk, mpsuzuki, 2007/03/21
- Re: [ft-devel] Minor misc patches to freetype cvs, from custom changes in vtk, Sean McBride, 2007/03/22
- Re: [ft-devel] Minor misc patches to freetype cvs, from custom changes in vtk, mpsuzuki, 2007/03/22
- Re: [ft-devel] Minor misc patches to freetype cvs, from custom changes in vtk, Sean McBride, 2007/03/23
- Re: [ft-devel] Minor misc patches to freetype cvs, from custom changes in vtk, mpsuzuki, 2007/03/23
- Re: [ft-devel] Minor misc patches to freetype cvs, from custom changes in vtk, Sean McBride, 2007/03/23
- Re: [ft-devel] Minor misc patches to freetype cvs, from custom changes in vtk, mpsuzuki, 2007/03/23