[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] Minor misc patches to freetype cvs, from custom chang
From: |
David Turner |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] Minor misc patches to freetype cvs, from custom changes in vtk |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:35:56 +0100 |
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 11:43:58 +0900, "Miles Bader" <address@hidden> said:
> "David Turner" <address@hidden> writes:
> > this will generate an error with certain compilers/pre-processors if
> > __LP64__ is not defined. generally speaking #if XXXXX is not a
> > portable statement, except if you ensure that the macro is always
> > defined beforehand.
>
> Is this true according to the C standard, or a problem with any
> non-obsolete compilers?
>
This is one of these things that are certainly not clarified in the C standard
[1],
which specifies that #if shall be followed by any "constant-expression", the
latter
being defined very loosely in the C language description, and specific
constraints
not really detailed.
So "#if FOO, where FOO is undefined" is ok with GNU cpp [2] but not with Visual
C++ [3]
I haven't looked at other compilers, but I wouldn't be surprised to see that
this is
a GNU-specific extension, or it may come from a tradition of various Unix
pre-processors,
but certainly can't be generalized...
> [I ask because such usage is widespread, and although gcc has a warning
> for
> it, it doesn't get turned on even with "-ansi -pedantic -Wall -Wextra",
> you have to enable it explicitly.]
>
I have no idea why, I suppose that forcing -Wundef with "-ansi -pedantic" would
have created problems when compiling a lot of code, due to its widespread usage
in Unix sources.
Hope this helps,
- David
[1] http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1124.pdf
[2] http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/cpp/If.html#If
[3]
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/vclang/html/vcrefPreprocessorReference.asp
- [ft-devel] Minor misc patches to freetype cvs, from custom changes in vtk, Sean McBride, 2007/03/19
- Re: [ft-devel] Minor misc patches to freetype cvs, from custom changes in vtk, mpsuzuki, 2007/03/19
- Re: [ft-devel] Minor misc patches to freetype cvs, from custom changes in vtk, David Turner, 2007/03/20
- Re: [ft-devel] Minor misc patches to freetype cvs, from custom changes in vtk, Miles Bader, 2007/03/21
- Re: [ft-devel] Minor misc patches to freetype cvs, from custom changes in vtk,
David Turner <=
- Re: [ft-devel] Minor misc patches to freetype cvs, from custom changes in vtk, Behdad Esfahbod, 2007/03/22
- Re: [ft-devel] Minor misc patches to freetype cvs, from custom changes in vtk, David Turner, 2007/03/22
- Re: [ft-devel] Minor misc patches to freetype cvs, from custom changes in vtk, Miles Bader, 2007/03/23
- Re: [ft-devel] Minor misc patches to freetype cvs, from custom changes in vtk, gww, 2007/03/22
Re: [ft-devel] Minor misc patches to freetype cvs, from custom changes in vtk, Sean McBride, 2007/03/20
- Re: [ft-devel] Minor misc patches to freetype cvs, from custom changes in vtk, mpsuzuki, 2007/03/21
- Re: [ft-devel] Minor misc patches to freetype cvs, from custom changes in vtk, Sean McBride, 2007/03/22
- Re: [ft-devel] Minor misc patches to freetype cvs, from custom changes in vtk, mpsuzuki, 2007/03/22
- Re: [ft-devel] Minor misc patches to freetype cvs, from custom changes in vtk, Sean McBride, 2007/03/23
- Re: [ft-devel] Minor misc patches to freetype cvs, from custom changes in vtk, mpsuzuki, 2007/03/23