[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] Relevance of new API FT_Get_Module_Flags ?
From: |
Huw D M Davies |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] Relevance of new API FT_Get_Module_Flags ? |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Feb 2006 10:37:59 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 07:03:15AM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> > > > Could someone tell me the relevance of the new public API named
> > > > FT_Get_Module_Flags that was introduced in the current CVS ?
> > >
> > > This might be answered best by Owen -- he has requested that
> > > feature, and he also provided the patch.
> > >
> > > > If this function's purpose is to determine wether the bytecode
> > > > interpreter is activated in a given FreeType build, I'd rather
> > > > like to see a specific API that returns a boolean, or an enum,
> > > > instead of asking users to understand our specific flags (which
> > > > we may need to change in the future, btw)
> > >
> > > This is OK with me. Owen?
> >
> > Wasn't me... maybe it was George?
>
> Ah, sorry, it was Huw.
Yes it was me. Its purpose was exactly that, to determine whether the
bytecode interpreter is enabled in a given build. A specific API that
returns either a bool or an enum would be fine.
Huw.
Re: [ft-devel] Relevance of new API FT_Get_Module_Flags ?, George Williams, 2006/02/21