[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ft-devel] Relevance of new API FT_Get_Module_Flags ?
From: |
david turner |
Subject: |
[ft-devel] Relevance of new API FT_Get_Module_Flags ? |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Feb 2006 10:56:53 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) |
Hello,
Could someone tell me the relevance of the new public API named
FT_Get_Module_Flags that
was introduced in the current CVS ?
I tend to consider that the module implementation shouldn't have been
exposed so publicly from
the start, and don't like anything that exposes even more of its
implementation.
If this function's purpose is to determine wether the bytecode
interpreter is activated in a given
FreeType build, I'd rather like to see a specific API that returns a
boolean, or an enum, instead
of asking users to understand our specific flags (which we may need to
change in the future, btw)
Any idea ?
- David Turner
- The FreeType Project (www.freetype.org)
***********************************************************************************
Information contained in this email message is confidential and may be
privileged, and is intended only for use of the individual or entity named
above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication
in error, please immediately notify the address@hidden and destroy the original
message.
***********************************************************************************
- [ft-devel] Relevance of new API FT_Get_Module_Flags ?,
david turner <=
Re: [ft-devel] Relevance of new API FT_Get_Module_Flags ?, George Williams, 2006/02/21