[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] On the impact of installing the next FreeType release on
From: |
George Williams |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] On the impact of installing the next FreeType release on a typical Unix distribution |
Date: |
16 Feb 2006 06:46:11 -0800 |
On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 06:15, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > As the author of a rogue client for which no patch is contemplated
> > (and for which we decided last year that there was no good way to
> > provide a patch) I must beg that
> >
> > TT_RunIns
> > remain reachable.
>
> We add `TT_RunIns' manually to the list of exported symbols. This
> should be sufficient, shouldn't it?
That's all I want.
Please, please, please.
Or a configuration option that does this if you'd prefer that it not be
default. That would be fine too, since default builds don't include
bytecode anyway people already have to reconfigure to use this in ff.
- [ft-devel] On the impact of installing the next FreeType release on a typical Unix distribution, david turner, 2006/02/15
- Re: [ft-devel] On the impact of installing the next FreeType release on a typical Unix distribution, Ilya Konstantinov, 2006/02/15
- Re: [ft-devel] On the impact of installing the next FreeType release on a typical Unix distribution, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/02/15
- Re: [ft-devel] On the impact of installing the next FreeType release on a typical Unix distribution, david turner, 2006/02/16
- Re: [ft-devel] On the impact of installing the next FreeType release on a typical Unix distribution, George Williams, 2006/02/16
- Re: [ft-devel] On the impact of installing the next FreeType release on a typical Unix distribution, david turner, 2006/02/16
- Re: [ft-devel] On the impact of installing the next FreeType release on a typical Unix distribution, George Williams, 2006/02/16