[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Devel] Dingbats in FreeType?
From: |
Keith Packard |
Subject: |
Re: [Devel] Dingbats in FreeType? |
Date: |
Sun, 04 May 2003 10:32:18 -0700 |
Around 9 o'clock on May 4, "James H. Cloos Jr." wrote:
> I suspect the best choice for fontconfig is to ignore the encoding
> vector in type1 fonts like dingbats in favour of using the glyph
> names directly.
To make this usable with Unicode-based applications, it seems like someone
needs to map the glyph names to their Unicode values (presuming they can
be mapped). I can place this mapping into fontconfig if you think that
would be useful, or we can ignore the problem and expect applications to
manage on their own.
-keith
- [Devel] Dingbats in FreeType?, Martin Sevior, 2003/05/01
- Re: [Devel] Dingbats in FreeType?, Werner LEMBERG, 2003/05/03
- Re: [Devel] Dingbats in FreeType?, Keith Packard, 2003/05/03
- Re: [Devel] Dingbats in FreeType?, James H. Cloos Jr., 2003/05/03
- Re: [Devel] Dingbats in FreeType?, Keith Packard, 2003/05/04
- Re: [Devel] Dingbats in FreeType?, James H. Cloos Jr., 2003/05/04
- Re: [Devel] Dingbats in FreeType?,
Keith Packard <=
- Re: [Devel] Dingbats in FreeType?, James H. Cloos Jr., 2003/05/04
- Re: [Devel] Dingbats in FreeType?, Martin Sevior, 2003/05/04
- Re: [Devel] Dingbats in FreeType?, Keith Packard, 2003/05/04
- Re: [Devel] Dingbats in FreeType?, Martin Sevior, 2003/05/04