[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Devel] Re: [Freetype] Re: [ttf2pt1-devel] about FT2 parser
From: |
Edward Lee |
Subject: |
[Devel] Re: [Freetype] Re: [ttf2pt1-devel] about FT2 parser |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Apr 2002 00:33:37 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.0i |
Hello Werner,
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> > But still produce the odd *.afm file, my example is bsmi00lp.ttf.
> > in my bsmi00lp06.afm,
> >
> > C 27 ; WX 1000 ; N ZdZ2708 ; B 41 322 956 25886 ;
> > ^^^^^
> >
> > So the bsmi00lp06.tfm(from afm2tfm) cannot use by TeX,
> >
> > % Args: -GE -pft -Ohub -W4 -L cubig5.map+06 bsmi00lp.ttf bsmi00lp06
>
> Using the CVS of ttf2pt1 from Apr. 22nd, and using the CVS from
> FreeType 2 of today, and using exactly your command line, I get the
> right result:
>
> ...
> C 26 ; WX 1000 ; N _d_2433 ; B 30 -83 964 844 ;
> C 27 ; WX 1000 ; N _d_2708 ; B 41 -47 956 818 ;
> C 28 ; WX 1000 ; N _d_2711 ; B 25 -89 969 822 ;
> ...
It might be off topic, sorry. But I DID find a strange thing.
* maybe just my ignorance.
yes, if just one line command, then everything is OK. But if
you try the sh script the weird thing happen(see attachment).
> I'm working on a Linux box, and I've compiled everything with gcc
> 2.95.3 (using `-O0 -g' in case this matters).
Yes, I try gcc-2.95.3 and gcc-2.96(Red Hat version), but seems
not the gcc's fault.
Thanks.
Rgds,
Edward G.J. Lee
mkfont
Description: Text document