[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Devel] address@hidden: freetype.h]
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [Devel] address@hidden: freetype.h] |
Date: |
Tue, 06 Feb 2001 09:38:15 +0100 (CET) |
> Should instances of
>
> #include "ft?????.h"
>
> be changed to
>
> #include "freetype/ft?????.h"
>
> Or should we just add "-I/usr/include/freetype" to CFLAGS?
> Which is the preferred practice? Thanks. :-)
This is a good question.
I think that, similar to the kpathsea library, FT 1.x applications
should use
#include "freetype/..."
Unfortunately, this isn't documented -- instructions how to install
and use the freetype headers are completely missing (only a small
entry in the changes.txt file gives a hint). Sigh.
FreeType 2 comes with a `freetype-config' script for UNIX platforms
(undocumented, of course) which implies -I and -L flags.
Werner