[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: some more issues with the new API
From: |
Just van Rossum |
Subject: |
Re: some more issues with the new API |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Mar 2000 20:33:55 +0100 |
At 5:40 PM -0800 16-03-2000, Angus Duggan wrote:
>Just van Rossum writes:
>>But what people need most is a "text service"...
>
>There are applications that don't need it, and the ones I have in mind are
>such things.
Just out of curiosity, what do you do that you need the a level API?
>If useless (to me) text service made FreeType harder for me to
>use, I won't use it. I feel if you want a higher level text service, then
>write such a thing as a separately compilable and/or loadable layer, and
>distribute it with FT2. Don't remove the low-level interface to do it, though.
I don't see why it wouldn't be possible to provide it as a layer on top of
the low-level API.
Just
- Re: some more issues with the new API, (continued)
- Re: some more issues with the new API, David Turner, 2000/03/16
- Re: some more issues with the new API, Just van Rossum, 2000/03/16
- Re: some more issues with the new API, David Turner, 2000/03/16
- Re: some more issues with the new API, Just van Rossum, 2000/03/16
- Re: some more issues with the new API, David Turner, 2000/03/16
- Re: some more issues with the new API, Just van Rossum, 2000/03/16
- Re: some more issues with the new API, David Turner, 2000/03/16
- Re: some more issues with the new API, Just van Rossum, 2000/03/16
- Re: some more issues with the new API, Stefan Seefeld, 2000/03/16
- Re: some more issues with the new API, Angus Duggan, 2000/03/16
- Re: some more issues with the new API,
Just van Rossum <=
- Re: some more issues with the new API, Just van Rossum, 2000/03/16
- Re: some more issues with the new API, Stefan Seefeld, 2000/03/16
- Re: some more issues with the new API, Stefan Seefeld, 2000/03/16