Re: org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift with reverse order

[Ihor Radchenko]

Christian Barthel <bch@online.de> writes:

> On the other hand: There are ways to specify the
> ordering like org-reverse-note-order.  Would it make
> sense to have one global `org-reverse-order' that is
> dealing with reversing "everything" that is somehow
> dependent on ordering?

The problem is that it is not very clear what to do when:

    org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift docstring:

    If the original subtree did contain time stamps with a repeater,
    the following will happen:
    ...
    - the original entry will be placed *after* all the clones, with
      repeater intact.

So, the change is not trivial.

-- 
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>