Re: [ANN] lisp/ob-tangle-sync.el

[Ihor Radchenko]

Mehmet Tekman <mtekman89@gmail.com> writes:

> Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> writes:
>
>> No. :result-params is not an actual header argument. It is
>> implementation detail - parsing :results header arg internally produces
>> (:results . "all the values concatenated") and _also_ (:result-params
>> "val 1" "val 2" ...).
>
> Hmm... what is the benefit if they encode the same
> information? (e.g. :tangle "one two \"three and four\"" vs
> :tangle-params "one" "two "three and four").
>
> Edit: Oh, I see -- Org parses the action from the `:tangle-params'
> and Users can extend tangle as much as they want via `:tangle'

No, not really. The main purpose is to avoid calling `split-string'
every time we need to check :results settings.

>> > Why can't we just go back to that?
>>
>> We can. I did not expect that we would need to go this far into the
>> rabbit hole. Although, I still think that unifying header argument
>> parsing is something worth doing, even if I need to implement it myself.
>
> Hah, me either. At the same time, it doesn't make sense to have
> `:tangle-sync' present in one release of Org-mode and then deprecated in
> the next (after your header rewrite). It would just confuse users.
>
> I'm happy to have another go at a unified header approach, I will
> just need to explore the code base a bit more.

Thanks! Feel free to ask anything. Babel code is not always easy to read.

-- 
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>