Re: [BUG] org-latex-packages-alist type specification [9.6.3 (release_9.6.3-2-gf2949d @ /usr/local/share/emacs/29.0.90/lisp/org/)]

[Ruijie Yu]

Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> writes:

> Ruijie Yu <ruijie@netyu.xyz> writes:
>
>>> Compiler list may also be nil.
>>
>> This should be covered by the repeat case?  Unless you want to be explicit
>> about this, in which case you can wrap it in a choice, whose first choice
>> being (const :tag “description” nil), and the second choice being the repeat
>> case.
>
> Yes, explicit tag will be better.

Updated and rebased (cleanly) onto current main.  Note that I moved the
type into a new line to keep everything below 66 columns.

0001-lisp-org.el-org-latex-packages-alist-fixed-type-defi.patch
Description: Text Data

-- 
Best,


RY

[Please note that this mail might go to spam due to some
misconfiguration in my mail server -- will fix soon.]