Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features"

[Sébastien Miquel]

Ihor Radchenko writes:
> However, it will be much harder to add something in the middle of the
> exported contents.

I do like the original proposal. The latex preamble is something that
a lot of users will want to modify, and is naturally made of a lot of
concatenated snippets with little interdependence. But I don't see
much point in extending the machinery for any org element.

For most changes, you'll have to copy and modify the original
transcoder's implementation anyway. At this point, you might as well
write the feature logic in lisp (checking features through =info=),
instead of your `transcoder-conditions`.

--
Sébastien Miquel