[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Re: Re: Re: org-forward-heading-same-level and the invisible
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Re: Re: Re: org-forward-heading-same-level and the invisible-ok argument |
Date: |
Sun, 06 Sep 2020 08:35:17 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
D <d.williams@posteo.net> writes:
>> Probably, it is easier if you just use seq-every-p instead of
>> mapcar on (number-sequence max-pos min-pos -1). The result of
>> seq-every-p will be inverse of the currently used expression.
>
> Oh yeah, that's much nicer. I also made the predicate check
> right-to-left, which just causes it to check the text bit of a heading
> first, which is useful for the cases where the predicate returns t and
> makes no difference otherwise. I again ran the tests and it seems ready
> to go.
Thanks for the patch.
Does it fix a problem for org-superstar-mode or a more general problem
in Org?
Why do you need to check the visibility status every character in the
headline (even for the org-superstar-mode, where you seem to need to
check for the visibility status /after/ the stars)?
If you use seq* functions, the code will be incompatible with previous
emacsen, right?
Thanks for any follow-up,
--
Bastien
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Re: Re: org-forward-heading-same-level and the invisible-ok argument,
Bastien <=
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Re: Re: org-forward-heading-same-level and the invisible-ok argument, D, 2020/09/06
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Re: Re: org-forward-heading-same-level and the invisible-ok argument, Bastien, 2020/09/07
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Re: Re: org-forward-heading-same-level and the invisible-ok argument, Ihor Radchenko, 2020/09/07
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Re: Re: org-forward-heading-same-level and the invisible-ok argument, D, 2020/09/07
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Re: Re: org-forward-heading-same-level and the invisible-ok argument, Bastien, 2020/09/08
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Re: Re: org-forward-heading-same-level and the invisible-ok argument, D, 2020/09/08
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Re: Re: org-forward-heading-same-level and the invisible-ok argument, Bastien, 2020/09/09
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Re: Re: org-forward-heading-same-level and the invisible-ok argument, Ihor Radchenko, 2020/09/09
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Re: Re: org-forward-heading-same-level and the invisible-ok argument, Bastien, 2020/09/09