[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: etc/HELLO: On Chinese and Cantonese
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
Subject: |
Re: etc/HELLO: On Chinese and Cantonese |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Oct 2020 08:35:21 -0700 |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> AFAIR, there are some non-trivial aspects here, some of them political
> and even ideological. There's PRC and there's ROC (a.k.a. Taiwan),
> and I'm not sure what will each group say about the proposed changes.
FWIW, RFC5646 suggests:
zh-Hant (Chinese written using the Traditional Chinese script)
zh-Hans (Chinese written using the Simplified Chinese script)
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5646
(Note that locale uses the names zh_CN and zh_TW instead.)
- etc/HELLO: On Chinese and Cantonese, Kai Ma, 2020/10/22
- Re: etc/HELLO: On Chinese and Cantonese, Mingde (Matthew) Zeng, 2020/10/22
- Re: etc/HELLO: On Chinese and Cantonese, Richard Stallman, 2020/10/22
- Re: etc/HELLO: On Chinese and Cantonese, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/10/23
- Re: etc/HELLO: On Chinese and Cantonese, Mingde (Matthew) Zeng, 2020/10/23
- Re: etc/HELLO: On Chinese and Cantonese, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/10/23
- Re: etc/HELLO: On Chinese and Cantonese, Basil L. Contovounesios, 2020/10/23
- Re: etc/HELLO: On Chinese and Cantonese, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/10/23