[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Patch for emacs/basic.texi
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Patch for emacs/basic.texi |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Sep 2020 00:04:48 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > + On a graphics terminal, the easiest way to invoke @code{undo} is
> > +with @kbd{C-/}; that doesn't need the shift key. On a text terminal,
> > +@kbd{C-/} does not exist, but usually you can type @kbd{C-_} without
> > +the shift key and it will work anyway.
> > +
> Does this only make sense with a qwerty keyboard?
I don't think the keyboard _layout_ makes a difference. An ASCII-only Dvorak
keyboard would presumably support the same control characters.
What matters is whether the keyboard uses ASCII or some wider character set.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: Patch for emacs/basic.texi, (continued)
- Re: Patch for emacs/basic.texi, Thibaut Verron, 2020/09/16
- Re: Patch for emacs/basic.texi, Kévin Le Gouguec, 2020/09/16
- Re: Patch for emacs/basic.texi, Andreas Schwab, 2020/09/16
- Re: Patch for emacs/basic.texi, Antoine Kalmbach, 2020/09/16
- Re: Patch for emacs/basic.texi, Kévin Le Gouguec, 2020/09/16
- RE: Patch for emacs/basic.texi, Drew Adams, 2020/09/16
- Repeating commands (was: Patch for emacs/basic.texi), Kévin Le Gouguec, 2020/09/16
- Re: Patch for emacs/basic.texi, Stefan Kangas, 2020/09/16
- Re: Patch for emacs/basic.texi, Richard Stallman, 2020/09/16
Re: Patch for emacs/basic.texi,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: Patch for emacs/basic.texi, Stefan Monnier, 2020/09/16
Re: Patch for emacs/basic.texi, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/09/18