[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28"
From: |
Robert Pluim |
Subject: |
Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28" |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Sep 2020 14:10:26 +0200 |
>>>>> On Wed, 09 Sep 2020 22:38:28 -0400, Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> said:
Richard> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider
]]]
Richard> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,
]]]
Richard> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example.
]]]
Richard> It is most unfortunate that any group of free software developers
has
Richard> started using Slack for discussions. Slack itself is nonfree
Richard> software, which means unjust software. GNU packages must not
Richard> recommend the use of Slack. To do so would be an own goal.
>> > The closest is the reddit channel where Eli interacts frequently. But
of
>> > course there is not any link to that in the emacs site, the readme or
>> > anywhere.
Richard> Is it possible to communicate through that channel without running
Richard> any nonfree software? (Including Javascript software?)
Thereʼs at least one emacs client for it, but it suffers from the same
issue as Gnus with the future changes to G-Suite: you need to log in
to reddit using a browser to generate the authentication
tokens. Logging in to www.reddit.com with LibreJS enabled fails for
me (although I get no warnings from LibreJS about nonfree Javascript).
Robert
- Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28", (continued)
- Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28", Vasilij Schneidermann, 2020/09/10
- Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28", Arthur Miller, 2020/09/09
- Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28", Ergus, 2020/09/09
- Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28", tomas, 2020/09/09
- Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28", Ergus, 2020/09/09
- Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28", tomas, 2020/09/09
- Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28", Arthur Miller, 2020/09/09
- Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28", Eli Zaretskii, 2020/09/09
- Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28", tomas, 2020/09/09
- Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28", Richard Stallman, 2020/09/09
- Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28",
Robert Pluim <=
- Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28", Richard Stallman, 2020/09/11
- Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28", Juri Linkov, 2020/09/09
- Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28", Ricardo Wurmus, 2020/09/10
- Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28", Arthur Miller, 2020/09/09
- Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28", Richard Stallman, 2020/09/09
- Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28", Dmitry Gutov, 2020/09/11
- Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28", Arthur Miller, 2020/09/11
- Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28", Ergus, 2020/09/11
- Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28", Jack Kamm, 2020/09/11
- Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28", Ergus, 2020/09/11