|
From: | Ergus |
Subject: | Re: How are the defaults chosen? |
Date: | Thu, 10 Sep 2020 02:00:33 +0200 |
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:06:18AM +0200, Daniel Mart??n wrote:
G??ktu?? Kayaalp <self@gkayaalp.com> writes:Having zero expertise I???d refrain from volunteering but the software of Sourcehut <https://sr.ht> could maybe of use?SourceHut is still in an early development stage, but seems like a good implementation of the now popular GitHub/Gitlab development workflow on top of mailing lists. It may definitely lower the barrier to contribute code to Emacs, or to report a problem. I see some SourceHut features could benefit Emacs development in other aspects as well, like the CI integration it offers. It's also free software, so it would be ethical to use it.
Actually not too much time ago there was a thread about migrating to the self-managed version of gitlab. https://about.gitlab.com/install/ This is what we use in my work and it is pretty completed and functional. AFAIK it is open source: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab And it works pretty fine out of the box with minimal configuration. The common integration with grafana, jenkins works pretty fine (I use it every day in my work) and the developer community is very open, so if there is any specific feature we need and it is not available they are usually available to help. AFAIR the only missing problem was the integration with emacs to track issues, and other "advanced" functionalities from there. But so far there were some initial work already done like: https://github.com/nlamirault/emacs-gitlab https://gitlab.com/joewreschnig/gitlab-ci-mode/ https://github.com/nlamirault/emacs-gitlab I think that SourceHut will have the same limitations and will be less stable than gitlab at the moment.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |