Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28"

[Ergus]

On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 06:18:44PM +0200, Thibaut Verron wrote:
> If the only point is to be able to do undo and redo easily, I believe that
> the
> problem is already solved by undo-only and undo-only-redo. Would giving
> undo-only-redo (if not done already) a default binding break anybody's
> workflow?
The problem is a bit trickier (I think) because undo-only/undo-only-redo
comes in pair (please correct me if I am wrong) so we need bindings for
the two.

> Le mar. 8 sept. 2020 � 17:54, Alfred M. Szmidt <ams@gnu.org> a �crit :
>
> > It seems that suggesting totally radical changes without any kind of
> > though is all the rage.  There are enough subtelities in how undo
> > works in emacs that, yes, the vast majority would find it annoying and
> > unusable if it was changed to something like undo-tree.