Re: [PATCH] Remove obsolete fast-lock and lazy-lock libraries

[Stefan Kangas]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> That's why I'm suggesting a `font-lock-debug-mode` instead.
>>
>> > Do you see any harm in keeping it as a defcustom?
>>
>> If we add `font-lock-debug-mode` I don't see any benefit in keeping it.
>> The harm is limited to accumulating cruft.
>
> If you are saying that we should make a single change which introduces
> font-lock-debug-mode and makes font-lock-support-mode a defvar, then I
> agree.  I thought you were advocating to make only the latter change,
> and then consider the former at some future time.

That sounds good.  Could we perhaps add that as a feature request to the
bug tracker and get rid of fast-lock and lazy-lock to begin with?

Best regards,
Stefan Kangas