[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs
From: |
Ulrich Mueller |
Subject: |
Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs |
Date: |
Mon, 03 Aug 2020 21:37:33 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> On Mon, 03 Aug 2020, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>> > Does anyone have a list of Emacs replacements?
>>
>> There is a list of Emacs implementations in the Gentoo wiki:
>> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Emacs/Emacs-like_editors
> You should probably take Zile off the list or make a note it is not
> recommended for use. According to Reuben Thomas, one of the Zile
> maintainers (from Zile Issue 58880):
> I consider Zile to be in maintenance mode. I do not
> recommend it use, I will not be adding features ...
Well, it is feature complete then.
The same is true for most of the lightweight implementations in the
list. Why would that be a problem?
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Jeffrey Walton, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs,
Ulrich Mueller <=
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Jeffrey Walton, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Ulrich Mueller, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Jeffrey Walton, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Stefan Monnier, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Gregory Heytings, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Amin Bandali, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Daniele Nicolodi, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Amin Bandali, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Daniele Nicolodi, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, andres . ramirez, 2020/08/03