Re: Opaque objects and Emacs documentation

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 21.07.2020 22:38, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> > I started replying to say that you are welcome to propose improvements
> > for better description of allowed semantics, but then again, you
> > probably meant something like more details about which cons cell
> > contains which values.
>
> Actually, no.  For user commands it is better to describe a project in
> terms of outside world: files, directories, repositories, etc.

Right.

Well, we're still growing the capabilities, and with that, the notion of 
what constitutes a project, is expanding bit by bit.

> > In the meantime, I have added more text to Commentary in project.el.
> > Please take a look whenever convenient.
>
> It is orders of magnitude better than what we had before.  Thank you
> very much for working on that.

Welcome!

But I basically retold (sometimes copied) the contents of the recent 
discussion. Which I said I'd do.