[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (type graphic)
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: (type graphic) |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 07:27:20 +0200 (IST) |
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Miles Bader wrote:
> Does the MS-DOS port have a non-nil value of window-system?
Yes, the MS-DOS port defines window-system to have the value 'pc.
> If so, maybe the correct change for right now is to replace
> `(display-graphic-p FRAME)' with just `window-system', and it will
> revert to the old behavior.
No, display-graphic-p has specific meaning which does not suit the MS-DOS
port. See the doc string and the description in the ELisp manual.
> More importantly, leave in `type graphic',
> but make a note that the graphic/tty distinction is broken on MS-DOS.
It's not broken. The MS-DOS port correctly returns nil for
display-graphic-p.
> > 3) Replace (type tty) with (type 8-color), or with some other magic
> > that looks at the number of the supported colors.
>
> [Such a distinction should be on the `(color ...)' tag, not the type tag.]
This is not important. What's important is that this alternative
requires massive editing of all the defface's out there. I doubt that we
want this so close to pretest.
- Re: (type graphic), (continued)
- Re: (type graphic), Andrew Innes, 2000/10/26
- Re: (type graphic), Eli Zaretskii, 2000/10/26
- Re: (type graphic), Jason Rumney, 2000/10/26
- Re: (type graphic), Eli Zaretskii, 2000/10/26
- Re: (type graphic), Jason Rumney, 2000/10/26
Re: (type graphic), Jason Rumney, 2000/10/25
- Re: (type graphic), Eli Zaretskii, 2000/10/25
- Re: (type graphic), Eli Zaretskii, 2000/10/27
- Re: (type graphic), Miles Bader, 2000/10/29
- Re: (type graphic), Miles Bader, 2000/10/29
- Re: (type graphic),
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: (type graphic), Eli Zaretskii, 2000/10/30
- Re: (type graphic), Miles Bader, 2000/10/30
- Re: (type graphic), Eli Zaretskii, 2000/10/30