[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (type graphic)
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: (type graphic) |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 08:35:10 +0900 (JST) |
"Eli Zaretskii" <address@hidden> writes:
> > (defface my-emphasis
> > '((((supported :italic)) :slant italic)
> > (((supported :height)) :height 2.0)
> > (((supported :underline)) :underline t)
> > (t :inverse-video t)))
>
> This is redundant, I think: unsupported attributes are simply ignored,
> so we cannot gain too much here. Note that Emacs deffaces almost
> always use color, either together or instead of the other attributes,
> so most faces will have some emphasis anyhow.
Just depending on unsupported attributes being ignored leads to ugly
faces, which are over-specified `so they work on all terminals'.
I.e., when someone can't be sure that just underline works, they specify
bold-underline-red. Visible? Yes. Hideous? Yes.
I'm not suggesting doing the above for 21.1, but something similar
*would* be useful, and almost trivial to implement.
-Miles
- (type graphic), Eli Zaretskii, 2000/10/25
- Re: (type graphic), Gerd Moellmann, 2000/10/26
- Re: (type graphic), Andrew Innes, 2000/10/26
- Re: (type graphic), Eli Zaretskii, 2000/10/26
- Re: (type graphic), Jason Rumney, 2000/10/26
- Re: (type graphic), Eli Zaretskii, 2000/10/26
- Re: (type graphic), Jason Rumney, 2000/10/26
Re: (type graphic), Jason Rumney, 2000/10/25