Re: Dependency on lisp.h

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 16:32:10 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Gerd Moellmann <address@hidden>
> > 
> > Since, when we discussed this several months ago, Richard opposed to
> > adding lisp.h to the dependencies, 
> 
> That matches my recollection.  I don't really understand it, though,
> and I've forgotten again what his reasons were.

The reasoning was that, on the one hand, many files include lisp.h, so
making that dependency explicit in Makefile.in would cause massive
recompilation.  And on the other hand, most changes in lisp.h do not
really require such recompilation, since they change a small fraction
of macros and prototypes.