[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New names for VC local version backups
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: New names for VC local version backups |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Oct 2000 14:20:23 +0200 (IST) |
On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> My personal favorite would be to use CVS/Base/<file>.~<rev>~,
My experience is similar: it is usually best to use a subdirectory than
to invent a new file-name format.
> The problem is that when a cache file is not needed any more,
> we'd like to remove it (else, they tend to accumulate rather quickly).
> But we can't blindly remove them because they might have been put
> there by the user (since nothing marks them as specifically "cache").
So you would like to remove files of the form <file>.~<rev>~, but you
are afraid that those might be backup files, yes?
Can't you assume they are not backup files since VC doesn't create
backups?
Re: New names for VC local version backups, Andre Spiegel, 2000/10/24
Re: New names for VC local version backups, Eli Zaretskii, 2000/10/24
Re: New names for VC local version backups, Andre Spiegel, 2000/10/25
Re: New names for VC local version backups, Eli Zaretskii, 2000/10/25