[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: modal proportionality, redux
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: modal proportionality, redux |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 14:13:27 +0900 (JST) |
Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> writes:
> I tried the same font and found that `*' (asterisk) is too
> small and is not at the middle of the line, but at too high
> place. I remember someone said the same thing. And, I
> personally don't like that appearance.
Stefan Monnier <monnier+gnu/address@hidden> writes:
> My problem wasn't so much with the dash but with the * which is really
> barely visible. So I agree that a proportional font would be better,
> but Helvetica doesn't cut it.
> Actually, looking at the few standard fonts I have installed, I'd
> say that the only proportional font whose asterisk is acceptable
> is Lucida.
[actually, times has a very nice asterisk, but I assume we're sticking
with sans-serif fonts here]
I also think lucida looks very nice (not just the asterisk; it seems to
have fewer extremes than helvetica, and generally suitable for this sort
of use). Does it come standard with all X distributions?
-Miles
--
Love is a snowmobile racing across the tundra. Suddenly it flips over,
pinning you underneath. At night the ice weasels come. --Nietzsche
- modal proportionality, redux, Miles Bader, 2000/10/17
- Re: modal proportionality, redux, Kenichi Handa, 2000/10/17
- Re: modal proportionality, redux,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: modal proportionality, redux, Kenichi Handa, 2000/10/17
- Re: modal proportionality, redux, Eric M. Ludlam, 2000/10/17
- Re: modal proportionality, redux, Miles Bader, 2000/10/17
- Re[1]: modal proportionality, redux, Eric M. Ludlam, 2000/10/17
- Re: modal proportionality, redux, Stefan Monnier, 2000/10/17
- Re: modal proportionality, redux, Dave Love, 2000/10/22
- Re: modal proportionality, redux, Stefan Monnier, 2000/10/23
- Re: modal proportionality, redux, Miles Bader, 2000/10/23
- Re: modal proportionality, redux, Dave Love, 2000/10/23
- Re: modal proportionality, redux, Gerd Moellmann, 2000/10/24